#

Dailypharm Live Search Close
  • Will the 53.55% generic drug pricing system be overhauled?
  • by Kim, Jin-Gu | translator Alice Kang | 2025-11-18 06:12:59
Ministry of Health and Welfare’s moves gain attention
Ministry to explain drug pricing reform direction at KPBMA Board Meeting
Changing generic drug pricing calculation rate from ‘53.55% of original drug price→below 50%’ under review; phased overhaul expected
Agendas include discussion on expanding government support linked to R&D investment, a major overhaul of the post-market surveillance system

The Korean government is moving toward a full-scale overhaul of the national drug pricing system Structural overhauls of the overall domestic drug pricing system are materializing, including adjustments to the generic drug pricing calculation rate, reform of the tiered pricing system, consolidation of post-marketing control systems, expansion of risk-sharing agreement and dual pricing systems, and introduction of R&D investment-linked drug pricing premiums.

 

According to industry sources on the 18th, the Ministry of Health and Welfare is scheduled to attend the Korea Pharmaceutical and Bio-Pharma Manufacturers Association’s board meeting this afternoon to explain the direction of the drug pricing system reform.

 

It is understood that Lee Jung-kyu, Director-General of the Bureau of Health Insurance Policy, will personally explain the reform's purpose and direction and request the pharmaceutical industry's participation.

 

The Ministry has been continuously discussing the reform of the drug pricing system.

 

Discussions have accelerated, particularly since the inauguration of the Lee Jae-myung administration.

 

The outline has been shaped to simplify an overly complex system, making it more predictable, while simultaneously encouraging R&D investment by domestic pharmaceutical and biotech companies.

 

A draft of the reform plan is reportedly already prepared.

 

Following the ministry's briefing to the KPBMA, the discussions on drug pricing system reform, which have been progressing behind the scenes, are expected to move into the official phase.

 

The focal point of interest is the generic drug price calculation rate.

 

Lowering the current 53.55% rate is understood to be one of the core elements of the reform plan.

 

Under the current system, the generic drug price is set at 59.5% of the original drug's highest price for the first year after initial listing.

 

From the second year onward, the price is maintained at a reduced rate of 53.55%.

 

To qualify for the 53.55% rate, both conditions must be met - ‘conducting its own bioequivalence test’ and ‘using a registered Drug Master File registered API.’ Meeting only one condition results in an additional 15% reduction (45.52% of the original price).

 

Failing to meet both conditions leads to a further 15% reduction (38.69% of the original price).

 

The government believes the current 53.55% benchmark is excessively high.

 

Although the exact adjustment level has not been disclosed, industry insiders expect a considerably lower figure, potentially around 40%.

 

An industry official stated, “If the discussion were merely about lowering the 53.55% calculation rate to 50%, the reform talks wouldn't have even started.

 

The consensus is that the final figure will be below 50%.” The tiered generic pricing system is also expected to face revisions.

 

Currently, the first 20 generic products maintain the 53.55% price level, and after the 20th, the price is reduced by 15% sequentially.

 

The 21st generic is priced at 85% of the lowest price among the first 20 products, and the 22nd generic is priced at 85% of the 21st generic, and so on.

 

In this regard, the Ministry of Health and Welfare considers the ‘20-product’ range as excessively broad.

 

It is reported that a plan to reduce this to around 10 products is under review.

 

However, it is understood that discussions are also underway to moderate the structure where prices drop by 15% after the 20th product, meaning fewer generics per tier, but smaller price drops per step.

 

A major consolidation of post-management regulations is also underway.

 

Current systems, including the ▲ Actual Transaction Price (ATP) reduction, ▲ reassessment of reimbursement adequacy, and  ▲ the Price-Volume Agreement system, run simultaneously.

 

The government has also previously considered introducing an external reference pricing-based reevaluation.

 

The Ministry of Health and Welfare plans to consolidate these systems to enhance predictability.

 

To this end, the Ministry commissioned a study titled “Integrated Framework for Post-Management of Drug Pricing” to the Daegu Catholic University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation in March this year.

 

Once the results are released at the end of the year, related discussions are expected to accelerate.

 

The drug price premium system is also likely to undergo a significant overhaul.

 

Given persistent criticism that the current premium system is overly complex, the government is considering a method to determine drug price premiums and preferential treatment based on the R&D investment ratio of pharmaceutical and biotech companies.

 

A pharmaceutical industry insider stated, “It is clear that the government intends to overhaul the multi-product, generic-centered market structure.

 

Based on the judgment that the system has become excessively complex due to additions made as needed over time, discussions are proceeding toward streamlining it within a broad framework to enhance predictability.

 

The government intends to strongly convey the message that growth is no longer feasible solely through a generic-centered market.” A government-ruling party official explained, “The focus of this reform is not on cutting healthcare spending.

 

The goal is to create an environment where pharmaceutical innovation can function properly.

 

We are reviewing options such as linking pricing premiums to the company’s R&D investment ratio.

 

The intent is to make R&D investment a key determinant of reward.”

 

  • 0
Reader Comment
0
Member comment Write Operate Rule
Colse

댓글 운영방식은

댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.

댓글 노출방식은

댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.

댓글의 삭제 기준은

다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.

  • 저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우

    상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물

    타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물

  • 근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물

    특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우

    특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용

    사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우

    욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용

    정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)

    특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우

    특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우

    특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우

    타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우

  • 게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용

    서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우

    동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우

    부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함

    제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우

    돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물

    게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우

  • 수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우

  • 기타사항

    각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우

    기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우

    기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용

  • 사실 관계 확인 후 삭제

    저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우

    타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우

    당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)

  • ※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.

    ※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.

    ※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.

If you want to see the full article, please JOIN US (click)