#

Dailypharm Live Search Close
  • NA urges for more COVID-19 vaccine, MOHW to take a survey
  • by Lee, Jeong-Hwan | translator Byun Kyung A | 2020-11-27 06:29:30
Lawmaker Kang Giyun “MOHW allocated no budget for vaccine procurement next year”
MOHW “Can get access to sufficient doses of vaccine, in negotiation with AstraZeneca and Pfizer”
MFDS “Self-testing kit not possible, only 2 professional testing kits are approved at the moment”

The National Assembly Health and Welfare Committee pressured the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) to focus their capacity to seek access to investigational COVID-19 vaccines around the world.

 

Also they ordered the South Korean government to extinguish the people’s concerns about the vaccines by proactively disclosing the corporate collaboration and contract information with a developer.

 

MOHW then answered the ministry would put more efforts to get access to COVID-19 vaccine, while it would survey the people’s perception on the immunization.

 

On Nov.

 

26, the National Assembly Health and Welfare Committee convened a general meeting and deliberated the bills the first and second Bill Examination Committees reviewed with questions to the government officials.

 

People Power Party Lawmaker Kang Giyun pointed out the MOHW’s next year budget plan does not include the COVID-19 vaccine procuring cost.

 

The lawmaker also reprimanded the ruling party’s responsibility as the Budget and Accounting Evaluation Subcommittee allocated 965 billion won for procuring the vaccines, but the Health and Welfare Committee did not pass it.

 

Moreover, Lawmaker Kang raised an issue on the government signing the contract with AstraZeneca with 70-percent effective vaccine, when Pfizer and Moderna are developing 94.5-percent and 90.0-percent effective vaccines, respectively.

 

Also he criticized the government for neglecting to proactively announce the detail.

 

Lawmaker Kang said he cannot agree with the MOHW’s policy to generate herd immunity by procuring 30 million doses, which would cover 60 percent of the people nationwide, and advised the Ministries to focus on getting access to over 50 million doses for the people.

 

Lawmaker Kang urged, “I cannot comprehend the reason why the government would sign a deal with AstraZeneca, when its vaccine is less effective than Pfizer’s and Moderna’s.

 

The news of locally manufacturing the vaccine should have come from a ministry’s official channel, and not from a news media.

 

Inexpensive price is important, but the vaccine quality and efficacy are more crucial.

 

And I do not believe securing the vaccines for only 60 percent of the population would get us to reach herd immunity.

 

Please get access to enough vaccines.” MOHW agreed with the lawmaker’s criticism about the government should put more effort, and answered it would seek access to vaccines with the efficacy and safety as much as possible.

 

But also the ministry said it would soon conduct a nationwide survey to grasp the people’s perception on the COIVD-19 immunization and to fathom the reasonable doses of vaccines to procure.

 

Minister Park Neung-hoo of Health and Welfare explained, “We have contacted all companies actually capable of manufacturing COVID-19 vaccine, and we are currently negotiating terms and conditions with more than five companies.

 

The deal would be sealed by the end of this year or early next year.

 

The 70 percent effectiveness of AstraZeneca’s vaccine is an average from two testing groups, and as far as I understand the company is manufacturing the 90-percent effective vaccine.” The minister added, “AstraZeneca had an advantage in talking about the procurement contract, as the company manufactures significant amount in South Korea.

 

We would also get access to stable amount of vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna.

 

Stocking too many doses of vaccine causes an issue of disposing unused ones.

 

Although we plan to take the responsibility until the end, we also plan to conduct a thorough survey on the national immunization.” With the third wave of COVID-19 cases in South Korea, with over 500 testing positive in a day, the lawmakers urged the government to approve of using a COVID-19 self-testing kit for the people to test the infection in the comfort of their home.

 

The government officials pleaded for the lawmakers’ understanding by explaining the current legal complications within the medical scene, where either a doctor or nurse has to take the sample for the testing.

 

People Power Party Lawmaker Kim Miae demanded the government officials to answer “why South Korea cannot use the self testing kit, when they can be used in the U.S.

 

with approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).” Democratic Party Lawmaker Shin Hyunyoung also ordered, “Raising the quarantine level higher due to the third wave of COVID-19 frustrates the people.

 

It would be difficult to provide it for all the people, but the government should consider expanding the use of rapid antigen testing kit in places with high risk of community infection, such as hospitals and army bases.” Minister Park answered, “In South Korea, the regulation on rapid testing kit defines the sampling of testing specimen as a medical practice.

 

Any healthcare institute with a doctor or nurse can test a subject, but self-testing by an individual is difficult at the moment.” The minister added, “Even in the U.S., children aged younger than 14 are regulated to must have a healthcare provider to sample the test specimen.

 

In Korea, the regulation allows the primary healthcare institutes to test COVID-19 infection, swiftly.” Minister Kim Gang-lip also elaborated, “The two testing kits with the market approval are all for medical professionals only.

 

The antigen testing kits require the testing specimen to be collected from deep inside of a nasal cavity with a tool.

 

Also the antibody testing kit requires blood to be drawn.

 

So providing access to self-testing kit would be unlikely.” The minister noted, “When a convenient self-testing kit product applies for the market approval, the ministry would review it based on safety and usability.

 

The FDA-approved self-testing kit also needs a doctor’s prescription.

 

Basically, only the specimen sampling can be done at home, after the doctor prescribes the testing kit.”

 

  • 0
Reader Comment
0
Member comment Write Operate Rule
Colse

댓글 운영방식은

댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.

댓글 노출방식은

댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.

댓글의 삭제 기준은

다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.

  • 저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우

    상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물

    타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물

  • 근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물

    특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우

    특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용

    사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우

    욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용

    정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)

    특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우

    특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우

    특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우

    타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우

  • 게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용

    서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우

    동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우

    부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함

    제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우

    돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물

    게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우

  • 수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우

  • 기타사항

    각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우

    기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우

    기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용

  • 사실 관계 확인 후 삭제

    저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우

    타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우

    당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)

  • ※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.

    ※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.

    ※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.

If you want to see the full article, please JOIN US (click)