#

Dailypharm Live Search Close
  • Halted fight between government vs. doctors damages both
  • by Kang, Shin-Kook | translator Byun Kyung A | 2020-09-09 05:46:47
Relatively calm private clinics and hospitals, but government taken back by junior doctors fighting fiercely
Criticism on “Medical reform plan disintegrated by medical strike,” ruling party claims “discussion to be continued”

The Korean Medical Association (KMA) has decided to temporarily halt but revisit their discussion with the government and the ruling party on increasing the quota for medical school and establishing public medical school, until COVID-19 is contained.

 

The junior doctors are most likely to return for their duty after the last discussion on Sept.

 

7.

 

Instead of revoking the policy, the government made up a pretext for re-discussing the medical reform policy, whereas the medical community paved their way to intervene in the future medical policy making process.

 

With COVID-19 spreading relentlessly, the talks on medical reform plan saw no clear winner or loser.

 

Ultimately the medical community also had to settle on a middle ground as they were to face the angry public, if the strike continued.

 

◆So did the ruling party ‘lose’ the battle?: Even within the ruling party, criticisms were made on the result of the ruling party and medical organization agreement.

 

Democratic Party Lawmaker Representative Lee Su-jin posted a comment on her social media on Sept.

 

4, "We are now supposed to re-discuss expanding the medical school quota and establishing public medical school from square one, and obviously we are putting a pin on introducing the regional doctor system, indefinitely.” Lee continued and evaluated, “The doctors used medical strike to maneuver their say in the medical reform policies the public is highly interested in.” Lawmaker Yun Kun-young firmly defended the ruling party’s decision and responded to the criticism on the agreement between the ruling party and the Korean Medical Association (KMA), saying, "Even if the government couldn’t save its face, and the ruling party feels humiliated, there is nothing we can do,” because “saving the people’s lives come first amid COVID-19.“ Democratic Party Policy Committee Chair Han Jeongae, who led the mediation between the government and the medical community, also refuted the criticisms that the government and the ruling party had surrendered to the medical community.

 

Lawmaker Han said, "The policy will be revisited again through persistent communication and discussion to resolve the unfair distribution of medical service in different regions, strengthen essential medical care and reform medical care system for the public.

 

Also the ruling party would endeavor to deliver the agreement signed between KMA and the Democratic Party.” The medical community is also still torn from the result.

 

KMA President Choi Dae-zip’s executives clashed with the interns and residents, who are already calling for President Choi’s impeachment.

 

Resisting against the agreement, the medical interns, residents and fellows demanded the strike to continue, but they declared the strike would be over without a justification to continue as KMA signed the agreement.

 

◆Private clinic and hospitals were calmer, but junior doctors arose: The most unique part of the medical strike was medical interns, residents, fellows and students taking the action together.

 

KMA President Choi Dae-zip signed an agreement with the ruling party and the government.
The medical reform plan to increase the medical school quota and opening public medical seemed to have stirred the young doctors more than private hospital doctors.

 

During the nationwide strike from Aug.

 

28 to 29, only about 6 percent of private hospitals and clinics went on a strike, but up to 84 percent of the medical interns and residents participated.

 

The private hospital strike participation rate went down over time, but the junior doctors’ participation rate continued to rise.

 

The medical community and the National Assembly analyze reaching the agreement would have been impossible without the participation and solidarity the young doctors showed.

 

The government also took Korean Intern Resident Association (KIRA), instead of KMA, as a negotiation counter partner.

 

This is the reason the ruling party agreement added a clause stating ‘fostering and supporting essential medical care, and practically improving medical interns and residents’ training environment.’ A National Assembly official commented, "It is true that the medical interns, residents and fellows play a significant role in the medical field," and “their absence in response against the pandemic would have pressured the government tremendously.” What the government feared the most was the actions taken by professors, interns and residents at tertiary hospitals.

 

Amid the epidemic, dysfunctional tertiary hospitals would be detrimental.

 

Specifically, the government was concerned with the inconvenience the patients requiring urgent care or fighting against severe diseases would experience.

 

This proved the role of private hospitals and clinics is weaker than that of tertiary hospitals amid COVID-19.

 

During the junior doctors’ fight against the government policy plan, KMA secured their seat in re-discussing the key agendas, such as the Health Insurance Policy Deliberation Committee structure, medical care delivery system reform, pilot program for Korean herbal medicine coverage, and non-contact medical service.

 

The government and the ruling party would have realized by now that fighting with doctors is never easy.

 

And the doctors now have the ‘strike’ as their open option whenever an unfavorable policy is on the table.

 

  • 0
Reader Comment
0
Member comment Write Operate Rule
Colse

댓글 운영방식은

댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.

댓글 노출방식은

댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.

댓글의 삭제 기준은

다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.

  • 저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우

    상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물

    타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물

  • 근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물

    특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우

    특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용

    사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우

    욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용

    정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)

    특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우

    특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우

    특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우

    타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우

  • 게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용

    서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우

    동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우

    부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함

    제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우

    돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물

    게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우

  • 수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우

  • 기타사항

    각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우

    기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우

    기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용

  • 사실 관계 확인 후 삭제

    저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우

    타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우

    당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)

  • ※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.

    ※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.

    ※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.

If you want to see the full article, please JOIN US (click)