

The latest ruling is expected to enable SK Bioscience's global export of its pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 'SKYPneumo' raw solution.
Ruling that 'Exporting SK Bioscience's SKYPneumo raw solution does not infringe on the patent'…an opportunity has been presented to export According to SK Bioscience, on May 21, the Supreme Court of Korea ruled in favor of SK Bioscience in a legal dispute filed by Pfizer for 'Cessation of infringement of Pfizer's Prevenar 13 (PCV13) pneumococcal conjugate vaccine patent.' The Supreme Court recently upheld the second trial ruling, which ruled in favor of SK Bioscience.
SK Bioscience and Pfizer long fought over whether the overseas supply of SKYPneumo's raw solution infringes on Pfizer's 'Prevenar 13.' This eight-year legal battle began in 2017 when Pfizer filed a patent infringement lawsuit.
The Supreme Court ruled that "Producing and supplying PCV13 finished products for research purposes does not infringe on the patent," adding, "Individual conjugates that make up PCV13 do not fall within the scope of the patent claim." It is analyzed that the Supreme Court's final ruling favoring SK Bioscience is expected to open the door for SK Bioscience to export SKYPneumo raw solution overseas.
SK Bioscience says, "While supplying PCV13 finished products is not permitted, the latest ruling presents an opportunity for supplying individual conjugates overseas," and added, "We plan to initiate a new project to supply raw solution of individual conguates to regions with high vaccine demand, such as Southeast Asia and Central and South America.
We also intend to pursue technology transfer through local partnerships." SK Bioscience vs.
Pfizer: Patent Invalidation·Infringement Lawsuits…3 out of 4 cases transferred to the Supreme Court In addition to this case, the dispute between SK Bioscience and Pfizer surrounding the Prevenar 13 patent has been ongoing for a long time, including 'patent invalidation' lawsuits filed by SK Bioscience and 'cessation of patent infringement' lawsuits counter-filed by Pfizer.
First, SK Bioscience challenged two related patents after developing SKYPneumo, a follow-up product to Prevenar 13.
SK Bioscience challenged two of Pfizer's Prevenar 13-related patents: ▲Expiring in March 2026, 'a novel formulation that stabilizes immunogenic compositions and prevents precipitation' patent ▲Expiring in April 2027, 'a multivalent pneumococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate composition' patent.
SK Bioscience filed invalidation trials for both patents.
Among these, the patent expiring in 2026 was successfully invalidated.
The Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board (IPTAB) ruled in favor of SK Bioscience in January 2020, and the decision was finalized without an appeal from Pfizer.
On the other hand, the patent expiring in 2027 ultimately failed to be invalidated.
SK Bioscience argued for the invalidation of this patent, but received a dismissal from IPTAB in June 2015.
SK Bioscience also lost in the second trial, which proceeded with SK Bioscience's appeal, in November 2017.
SK Bioscience decided to appeal to the Supreme Court.
However, they again received a losing ruling from the Supreme Court in 2018.
In conclusion, the patent expiring in March 2026 was successfully invalidated, while the patent expiring in April 2027 was not.
Consequently, domestic sales of SKYPneumo are prohibited until April 2027.
Pfizer counter-filed a patent infringement prohibition lawsuit against SK Bioscience during this process.
In 2017, Wyeth LLC, the patent holder of Prevenar 13, and Pfizer Korea, the domestic distributor, filed a lawsuit claiming that SKYPneumo infringed on their patent rights.
This lawsuit also went to the third trial.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court issued a recommendation for settlement in 2019, essentially siding with Pfizer.
The Supreme Court ruled that Pfizer's patent was valid and prohibited the production and launch of SK Bioscience's SKYPneumo until 2027.
SK Bioscience voluntarily withdrew the product approval for SKYPneumo.
However, they re-obtained approval for SKYPneumo in June 2021.
The conflict between the two companies continued thereafter.
Facing difficulties with the domestic launch, SK Bioscience signed a license agreement to transfer related technology to a Russian pharmaceutical company to develop vaccines in that region.
SK Bioscience supplied raw solution for its self-developed pneumococcal vaccine and finished pharmaceutical products for research.
Pfizer and Wyeth LLC also interfered with this, filing a cession of patent infringement lawsuit in 2020.
SK Bioscience countered, arguing that supplying raw solution for research and testing purposes, not finished products, to overseas markets was outside the scope of patent infringement.
In August 2023, Pfizer won in the first trial.
SK Bioscience appealed, and ultimately, the Patent Court overturned the first trial ruling and sided with SK Bioscience.
This time, Pfizer appealed to the Supreme Court after losing in the second trial.
Finally, the Supreme Court upheld the original ruling in the appeal.
The two companies engaged in a long-term battle, going to the Supreme Court for three out of four cases, including patent invalidation lawsuits and patent infringement lawsuits.
With this, most disputes between the two companies concerning the Prevenar 13 patent have been concluded.
However, a trade commission dispute remains.
The Korea Trade Commission under the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy is investigating SK Bioscience's unfair trade practices.
This is because Pfizer and Wyeth LLC have filed a complaint requesting a cessation on exporting SK Bioscience's pneumococcal raw solution.
In the pharmaceutical industry, there is an outlook that the trade commission dispute surrounding the export of pneumococcal raw solution will also be concluded soon due to this Supreme Court ruling.
댓글 운영방식은
댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.
댓글 노출방식은
댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.
댓글의 삭제 기준은
다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.
저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우
상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물
타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물
근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물
특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우
특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용
사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우
욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용
정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)
특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우
특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우
특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우
타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우
게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용
서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우
동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우
부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함
제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우
돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물
게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우
수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우
기타사항
각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우
기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우
기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용
사실 관계 확인 후 삭제
저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우
타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우
당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)
※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.
※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.
※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.