- LOGIN
- MemberShip
- 2026-03-10 07:55:22
- Company
- The significance of Ozempic's reimbursement coverage in KOR
- by Son, Hyung Min Feb 13, 2026 08:29am
- Novo Nordisk’s GLP-1 receptor agonist Ozempic has entered Korea’s reimbursement system.Experts consider this development highly significant, as this newly reimbursed therapy has demonstrated not only glucose-lowering efficacy but also evidence supporting reductions in cardiovascular and renal risks. However, discussion continues regarding the gap between reimbursement criteria and real-world clinical practice, as the coverage requirements are structured around failure with existing therapies such as sulfonylureas (SU), potentially limiting patient access.On the 13th, Novo Nordisk held a briefing at the Four Seasons Hotel in Jongno-gu, Seoul, to commemorate the domestic reimbursement approval of Ozempic (semaglutide), a type 2 diabetes treatment.(From the left) Hee Woo Lee, Director of Diabetes BU at Novo Nordisk Korea; Jang Won Son, Professor of Endocrinology at Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital; Cheol-Young Park, Professor of Endocrinology at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital; Ju Ok Lim and Ji Hyun Kim from Medical Affairs, Novo Nordisk KoreaOzempic is indicated for patients who have received metformin + an SU agent for at least 2–4 months but maintain HbA1c ≥7% who are a BMI ≥25 kg/m² or who are unable to undergo basal insulin therapy. For these patients, only triple combination therapy (metformin + SU + Ozempic) is reimbursed initially. Switching to dual combination therapy (metformin + Ozempic) is only permitted if significant glycemic improvement is achieved thereafter.Additionally, if HbA1c remains ≥7% despite 2-4 months of basal insulin monotherapy or metformin combination therapy, or if HbA1c remains ≥7% despite Ozempic combined with metformin (±SU), reimbursement is granted for use of Ozempic + basal insulin (±metformin) combination therapy.In clinical trials, Ozempic demonstrated improvements not only in glycemic control but also across cardiovascular and renal endpoints.Specifically, in the Phase III SUSTAIN 1-5, 7, and 9 trials, Ozempic showed a higher rate of achieving HbA1c below 6.5% compared to placebo.Furthermore, in the Phase III SUSTAIN 6 trial, Ozempic reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 26% compared to the placebo group. In the Phase III FLOW trial, it reduced the risk of the composite renal outcome measure by 24% compared to placebo.Ozempic is the only GLP-1 receptor agonist to demonstrate therapeutic benefits in reducing cardiovascular and renal disease risks.Dr. Jang Won Son, Professor of Endocrinology at Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, emphasized, “With the clinical value of GLP-1 receptor agonist-based therapy reaffirmed, Ozempic’s reimbursement coverage represents a significant step forward in improving treatment accessibility.”Reimbursement criteria remain restricted... Need for consideration to improve patient accessDespite guideline recommendations supporting the use of GLP-1 therapies for patients with inadequate glycemic control or coexisting cardiovascular/renal disease, treatment access had remained limited due to its non-reimbursed status.According to the Diabetes Fact Sheet 2025 released by the Korean Diabetes Association, approximately half of diabetes patients are obese, with 61.1% of them exhibiting abdominal obesity. Consequently, there is high potential for utilizing GLP-1 agents, which can demonstrate weight loss effects among diabetes treatments.Dr. Cheol-Young Park, Professor of Endocrinology at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, said, “While disease awareness among Korean diabetes patients is relatively high at 74.7%, only 32.4% achieve HbA1c below 6.5%, indicating persistent challenges in glycemic control.”He added, “Major domestic and international guidelines recommend a comprehensive approach that considers various risk factors alongside blood glucose management to reduce the risk of diabetes complications. Semaglutide formulations, in particular, can be considered a treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes accompanied by chronic kidney disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), as well as for those requiring weight management.”However, concerns have been raised about limitations in the reimbursement criteria. In current clinical practice, combination therapy using DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors is widely used, with sulfonylurea increasingly being avoided due to the risk of hypoglycemia and patient characteristics.Yet, the need to use sulfonylureas again to meet the treatment failure requirement in Ozempic’s reimbursement criteria borders on a regulation that forces failure. The fact that even discretionary non-reimbursed prescriptions are not permitted for patients who fail to meet reimbursement criteria is also controversial. This has led to backlash, with critics questioning whether the government is preemptively assuming patients' treatment needs.Professor Park said, “Although GLP-1 agents are recommended in numerous guidelines, limitations in reimbursement access have constrained their practical application in domestic clinical settings. Many guidelines recommend integrated treatment, but this remains difficult in the Korean environment. It has been over 10 years since DPP-4 inhibitors emerged. Even when DPP-4 inhibitors first appeared, most clinicians did not consider SUs as first-line therapy. The reimbursement criteria need to change."Professor Son emphasized, “The recently announced domestic reimbursement criteria have some limitations compared to current guidelines. Therefore, continued discussions are needed to enable a more flexible application that reflects complication risks. It is crucial to confirm whether measures initially taken out of excessive concern for misuse could be reevaluated later.”
- Policy
- 253 new diabetes drugs listed in 1 year
- by Jung, Heung-Jun Feb 13, 2026 08:29am
- Diabetes medications accounted for the largest share among drugs newly listed for National Health Insurance reimbursement coverage over the past year.Notably, the mass listing of triple combination therapies is accelerating a market shift centered on these multi-drug combinations that emphasize dosing convenience.Reviewing the HIRA reimbursement list on the 12th shows that new diabetes drug listings (classification code 396) surged from 1,723 to 1,976 items from 1,723 in January last year to 1,976 in January this year, representing an increase of approximately 14%.Among drugs newly covered over the past year, the increase in diabetes medications (classification code 396) is the most noticeable. (AI-generated image)The impact of Jardiance (empagliflozin, Boehringer Ingelheim) patent expiry was significant. Over 200 generics were listed around the expiry date last October and are still being added to the reimbursement list. Empagliflozin combination products, in particular, showed a noticeable increase.Previously, AstraZeneca decided to withdraw Forxiga (dapagliflozin) from the Korean market 2 years ago, generic competition intensified significantly. During that period, Jardiance also expanded its prescription volume by capturing market share vacated by Forxiga.This time, however, the focus shifted as a large number of generics entered Jardiance’s KRW 110 billion market, driving a rapid rise in reimbursed diabetes drug listings.Compared to January last year, the number of triple-combination diabetes drugs doubled. The number increased from 16 items in January last year to 32 items this January. Triple combinations featuring sitagliptin, metformin, and empagliflozin or dapagliflozin became mainstream.Following empagliflozin’s patent expiry, multiple new triple combinations have been introduced. Meanwhile, dapagliflozin-based products are expanding primarily through dose diversification within existing combination portfolios.Although dual combination therapies continue to grow, the segment already includes more than 1,000 products, resulting in intense market competition. Consequently, pharmaceutical companies are increasingly pursuing triple combination products as a competitive strategy. The number of triple-combination drugs entering the reimbursement list is expected to increase further this year.While the clinical rationale centers on multi-mechanism therapy and improved patient adherence, industry observers note that market share defense is also a significant factor driving this trend.Conversely, single-agent drugs like metformin showed a slight decline, further reflecting the market’s transition toward combination-based treatment strategies.
- InterView
- "Psoriasis, stage-specific strategy emerges…Sotyktu"
- by Son, Hyung Min Feb 13, 2026 08:28am
- The treatment paradigm for psoriasis is rapidly shifting. While the past was characterized by a structure transitioning from systemic therapies for severe patients to biologics, the recent emergence of oral therapies is segmentizing treatment strategies.In particular, with the introduction of BMS's selective TYK2 inhibitor 'Sotyktu (deucravacitinib),' discussions regarding intermediate-stage treatments that can be utilized before biologic, are in full-scale.Professor Dong Hyun Kim of the Department of Dermatology at Cha University Bundang Medical Center (CBMC)DailyPharm met with Professor Dong Hyun Kim of the Department of Dermatology at Cha University Bundang Medical Center (CBMC) to discuss changes in the psoriasis treatment landscape and remaining challenges for improvement.Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease caused by immunological abnormalities. It is characterized by silvery-white scales (dead skin cells) accumulating over red rashes. As symptoms worsen, lesions merge extensively into plaque psoriasis, which accounts for 80–90% of all psoriasis patients.While the domestic prevalence is estimated at approximately 3% (about 1.5 million patients), fewer than 15% actually visit medical institutions. Despite the heavy mental and social burden, as lesions often appear on exposed body parts, a significant treatment gap persists.Psoriasis is more than just a skin condition. It is highly associated with metabolic diseases such as psoriatic arthritis, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Reports suggest that the risk of systemic disease in psoriasis patients is 1.5 to 2.5 times higher than in the general population. This is why long-term, systematic management is needed.Recently, with the introduction of various advanced therapies, including biologics and small-molecule drugs, treatment goals are steadily rising.Sotyktu, the first selective TYK2 inhibitor to emerge in this space, is known for its mechanism of selectively targeting and inhibiting TYK2 signaling, a key inflammatory pathway in psoriasis development. By doing so, it suppresses the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Notably, as an oral option, Sotyktu may be highly utilized for patients who are averse to injectable treatments.Professor Kim explained, "The recent changes in the treatment landscape are significant not just because of the increase in new drugs, but because we can now design customized strategies for individual patients."Q. How has the psoriasis treatment landscape changed compared to the past?In the past, methotrexate or cyclosporine were the center of first-line systemic therapy. However, it was difficult to maintain sufficient dosages due to concerns over long-term side effects such as hepatotoxicity. As a result, there was a strong tendency to treat moderate patients primarily with topical agents.Recently, the arrival of biologics and small-molecule treatments, such as TYK2 inhibitors, has made long-term treatment feasible. While the past goal for Sotyktu might have been PASI 75 (75% improvement in psoriasis severity), we are now in an era where we expect PASI 90 or even 100. More patients are reaching a state where lesions are almost non-existent.Q. What are the mechanistic advantages of the oral agent Sotyktu?In psoriasis, pathological Th17 cells that overproduce interleukin (IL)-17 play a central role. IL-23 is the cytokine that continuously activates these Th17 cells, and TYK2 plays a critical role in transmitting this signal into the cell. Sotyktu is a treatment designed to block the root of the pathological inflammatory response by selectively inhibiting this TYK2 signaling.Globally, before Sotyktu’s launch, the apremilast was an advanced oral option. In Korea, only generics were used instead of the original drug, and because their efficacy was not superior compared to other options, they were not widely used in clinical practice. Sotyktu has been shown in clinical trials to be more effective than apremilast.Q. Given that psoriasis requires long-term management, what are the advantages of oral agents in chronic care?In practice, assuming the treatment method and efficacy are equal, patients may prefer treatments with longer administration intervals that require fewer hospital visits. However, there are clear differences between oral and injectable medications. The biggest advantage of oral drugs is high medication convenience. Nevertheless, to maintain therapeutic effects, it is crucial to take them consistently without interruption.In clinical settings, preferences vary by age group. Younger patients who are socioeconomically active due to employment, interpersonal relationships may find daily dosing burdensome or desire rapid results. Conversely, older patients tend to maintain medication adherence more consistently and choose options with a lower financial burden.Q. What factors do you comprehensively consider when selecting a treatment?In practice, we select treatments based not only on the severity of psoriasis but also on the patient's lifestyle and expectations. Domestic consensus generally evaluates IL-17 inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors as having overall equivalent efficacy, with differences primarily in the speed of action. These features, dosing cycles, and patient preferences affect the choice.The health insurance in Korea is also a major variable. Biologics are generally expensive and mostly prescribed to patients covered under the "Special Calculation System". However, fewer than 10% of Korean psoriasis patients qualify for this system. Given that clinicians often struggle to apply this status, even in moderate-to-severe cases, oral agents like Sotyktu are a rational choice given patients' out-of-pocket costs.Sotyktu, taken as one pill a day, is characterized by its safety for long-term use. With patient co-pays at approximately KRW 200,000 to 250,000 per month and eligibility for private indemnity insurance, I believe it is an appropriate option for patients who require long-term treatment but do not yet meet the criteria for the Special Calculation System.Q. Which patient groups are considered for Sotyktu prescriptions as a primary treatment?The most important characteristic of the patient group for whom I prioritize Sotyktu is a resistance to injectable therapy. Previously, clinicians typically thought of biologics as the immediate next step after first-line systemic therapy failed. Now, I believe an "intermediate" treatment option has emerged between those steps.Sotyktu can be a suitable choice for patients who have failed systemic therapy but find the prospect of moving directly to biologics burdensome.While the concept of "intermediate-stage therapy" is not yet clearly defined, if a patient does not necessarily require biologics, an approach that first passes through this stage, reserving biologics for those with an insufficient response, can also be rational from a pricing perspective. Additionally, there is a tendency to prefer Sotyktu for scalp treatment.Since some patients do reach PASI 90, identifying the right patient is key. It is an option worth considering for those with severe symptoms in localized areas, such as the scalp, or for patients whose Body Surface Area (BSA) does not exceed 10% but who have severe local lesions.Q. How do you evaluate the data and efficacy of Sotyktu in Asian patients?Currently, Real-World Data (RWD) for Sotyktu is gradually accumulating across various hospitals and medical institutions in Korea. In cases where patients who participated in previous clinical trials had to stop treatment for a period due to insurance issues and later resumed with Sotyktu, those who previously responded well tended to maintain efficacy upon re-administration.While Asian patients may have different clinical characteristics compared to Western populations, they generally have lower body weights and often diligently combine oral treatment with topicals. Considering this, as more RWD is collected, we may observe clinical efficacy even better than that seen in clinical trials.I have a patient who was referred to our hospital and participated in a clinical trial to take Sotyktu. The patient had very severe symptoms at the time but has now continued treatment for nearly six years, with the effect remaining stably maintained.Q. Late-comer treatments are expanding indications beyond psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Do you expect the utility of TYK2 inhibitors to grow as their indications expand?Because TYK2 inhibitors are involved in multiple inflammatory signaling pathways, not just IL-23 but also interferons (IFN), I understand that clinical trials are currently underway to expand their indications.If indications are expanded, the scope of utility could include various inflammatory diseases, including autoimmune conditions such as lupus. From a dermatological perspective, I expect it will be most widely used for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis for the time being. Beyond that, there is ample potential for its application to expand into inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or various rheumatic diseases.Q. What aspects of the psoriasis treatment environment need improvement?As of now, many patients are not sufficiently aware of Sotyktu. Unlike in other countries, drug advertising is prohibited in Korea, so clinicians must directly explain the drugs to patients. Despite psoriasis being a disease with clear treatment effects, many patients discontinue treatment or repeat ineffective treatments due to vague fears about side effects.Another realistic issue is the insurance authorization process. To maintain Special Calculation status, PASI and BSA must be evaluated every six months, which involves tedious, time-consuming procedures such as charting and photography. Since there is no separate medical fee for this process, primary care physicians are sometimes hesitant to use it.Even though these treatments can be prescribed without specialized equipment, institutional conditions limit drug utility in the field. Consequently, since the psoriasis Special Calculation System began in 2017, there has been cases where patients crowding into university hospitals. In the future, I believe the government should establish fees for PASI/BSA evaluations and patient education so that primary care and regional medical institutions can manage psoriasis patients more systematically.
- Opinion
- [Reporter's View] Why the rush for drug pricing reform?
- by Jung, Heung-Jun Feb 13, 2026 08:28am
- While the pharmaceutical industry and citizen groups are calling for a postponement of the drug pricing system reform, the government is remaining silent.With the conclusion from the Health Insurance Policy Review Committee imminent, doubts persist regarding the effectiveness and feasibility of the reform.The reform plans appear underdeveloped, leading to concerns that achieving National Health Insurance (NHI) financial savings may prove difficult. Under these circumstances, the government may need a break to ensure the successful achievement of its policy goals.Voices calling for the establishment of a social consultative body are mounting. Following the pharmaceutical industry and the Federation of Korean Trade Unions (FKTU), civic groups, including the Citizens' Coalition for Economic Justice, have joined in expressing concern over the enforcement of policies without adequate communication.Regarding the price reduction of generic drugs, a backlash involving the weakening of the industrial base and employment instability is anticipated. If the reform is implemented in its current state, pharmaceutical companies are predicted to shift toward austerity measures rather than expanding investment in research and development (R&D).Furthermore, the policy to enhance access to treatments for rare diseases continues to draw demands for clarity on financial management and post-monitoring measures. This is precisely the concern raised recently by these organizations.Critics question whether a management plan is in place for the NHI budget, which is expected to increase as the entry barriers for high-priced new drugs are lowered. If the funds saved from generic price cuts are entirely absorbed by high-priced drugs, the anticipated drug expenditure reduction effect of the reform will vanish.The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) cites the restructuring of the Korean pharmaceutical industry and the creation of momentum for global expansion as the expected goals of this reform. However, the policy could unexpectedly cause industrial imbalance and exacerbate an unstable growth foundation. This suggests a need for the government to take the time to address concerns from the field.No one disputes the justification for improving the generic industry's constitution or enhancing access to rare disease treatments.However, policy is not made by good intentions alone. The MOHW repeatedly emphasizes the number of generic items to justify the need for structural reform. In response to the industry's question, "Why the rush?", the government must show a willingness to discuss qualitative strategies for constitutional improvement rather than merely listing quantitative figures.On the 10th, the Korea Pharmaceutical and Bio-Pharma Manufacturers Association (KPBMA) announced a resolution calling for a postponement of the reform and presented the government with an impact assessment of the proposed changes. Additionally, citizen groups have announced a follow-up press conference on the impact of the generic drug pricing reform. As industry, citizen, and labor groups all express a sense of crisis, the government must communicate to find ways to minimize adverse side effects.
- Company
- AZ Achieves dual milestone in liver and biliary tract cancers
- by Eo, Yun-Ho Feb 13, 2026 08:28am
- AstraZeneca has achieved a significant milestone. AstraZeneca’s immunotherapy-based combination regimens in both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) are expected to be simultaneously listed for reimbursement in Korea.According to Dailypharm coverage, AstraZeneca Korea recently concluded price negotiations with the National Health Insurance Service for the combination therapy of the PD-L1 inhibitor ‘Imfinzi (durvalumab)’ and the CTLA-4 inhibitor ‘Imjudo (tremelimumab)’ as first-line treatment for adult patients with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.In parallel, reimbursement pricing was also concluded for Imfinzi in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin for first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.This achievement comes approximately 3 months after Imfinzi and Imjudo passed the Drug Reimbursement Evaluation Committee (DREC) review in November last year. For biliary tract cancer, this marks the emergence of a new treatment option in nearly a decade.The journey toward reimbursement listing for the Imfinzi-based combination regimens was not smooth. In November 2024, the Imfinzi + chemotherapy regimen for HCC, and the Imjudo combination regimen for BTC successfully passed the Cancer Drug Review Committee. However, when submitted to DREC 10 months later in September of the following year, both regimens received a redeliberation decision.In this context, passing the DREC review in November and concluding the price negotiation demonstrates the pharmaceutical company's efforts. The government's second flexible application of the ICER threshold, following the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) anticancer drug Trodelvy (sacituzumab govitecan), also played a significant role.The Imfinzi and Imjudo combination therapy involves administering the combination only once initially, followed by maintenance therapy with Imfinzi alone. This approach reduces the burden of administration compared to existing standard therapies that include VEGF antibodies and offers the advantage of being suitable for patients with vascular invasion.This therapy demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in the HIMALAYA study, which became the first Phase III clinical trial targeting patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma receiving first-line treatment to show such benefit.There had been virtually no treatment option that demonstrated safety and efficacy through a large-scale Phase 3 clinical trial in first-line biliary tract cancer. Imfinzi, which had been partially non-reimbursed in this area, became the new standard of care after over a decade, based on the improved overall survival in the TOPAZ-1 study when used in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin.
- Company
- Big pharma companies report strong financial results
- by Chon, Seung-Hyun Feb 12, 2026 06:38am
- Last year, major South Korean pharmaceutical and biotech companies reported robust earnings, driven by differentiated R&D capabilities in innovative drugs, biosimilars, and contract development and manufacturing (CDMO). Samsung Biologics and Celltrion set all-time highs, while traditional pharmaceutical firms maintained record-breaking performances based on their proprietary research. According to the Financial Supervisory Service on the 12th, 14 out of 15 leading domestic firms with annual revenues exceeding KRW 500 billion, including Yuhan Corporation, GC Biopharma, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, and Hanmi Pharmaceutical, showed sales growth compared with the previous year. 13 of these 15 firms reported increased operating profits, with the exceptions of Chong Kun Dang and Dong-A ST.Samsung Biologics·Celltrion Continue Record Performance…Operating Profit HikeSamsung Biologics and Celltrion have significantly accelerated their growth, widening the distance from traditional pharmaceutical companies.Samsung Biologics and Celltrion have significantly accelerated their growth, widening the distance from traditional pharmaceutical companies through aggressive expansion and high-margin business models. Samsung Biologics recorded an unprecedented operating profit of KRW 2.07 trillion, a 56.6% increase, on revenue of KRW 4.56 trillion. Its operating profit margin reached 45.4%.Samsung Biologics primarily focuses on Biopharmaceutical Contract Manufacturing (CMO) and Contract Development (CDO). The company’s growth was increased by the stable, full-capacity operation of Plants 1-3, alongside the successful launch of Plant 4. Since its inception, Samsung Biologics has steadily increased its capacity from Plant 1 (30,000L), Plant 2 (155,000L), and Plant 3 (180,000L) to Plant 4, which stands as the world’s largest single facility at 240,000L. With the 180,000-liter Plant 5 commencing operations in April last year, Samsung Biologics’ total production capacity has expanded to 785,000 liters.The company's performance exceeded the previous year's consolidated figures, even after excluding its biosimilar subsidiary, Samsung Bioepis.Following a corporate spin-off in November, Samsung Biologics now focuses strictly on the CDMO business, while the newly formed Samsung Epis Holdings oversees biosimilars and new drug development.Celltrion also recorded an annual operating profit of 1.17 trillion KRW, a 137.5% year-on-year increase. Revenue grew by 17.0% to exceed 4.16 trillion KRW for the first time in the company’s history, yielding an operating profit margin of 28.1%.Celltrion has obtained marketing authorizations in Europe and the United States for a robust portfolio, including Remsima, Herzuma, Truxima, Remsima SC, Zymfentra, Yuflyma, Vegzelma, Steqeyma, Stoboclo·Osenvelt, Omlyclo, AVTOZMA, and Eydenzelt.While existing products such as Remsima, Truxima, and Herzuma maintained stable growth, Celltrion's recently launched biologics, including Remsima SC, Yuflyma, Vegzelma, Steqeyma, Stoboclo·Osenvelt, Omlyclo, AVTOZMA, and Eydenzelt, were classified as new revenue drivers. All of these products reached record-high annual sales.Celltrion has secured 25 approvals across Europe and the United States. Specifically, Remsima, Herzuma, Truxima, Remsima SC, Zymfentra, Yuflyma, Vegzelma, Steqeyma, Stoboclo·Osenvelt, Omlyclo, AVTOZMA, and Eydenzelt have all received regulatory green lights in these regions.Remsima recorded sales of KRW 1.0495 trillion last year. Additionally, Remsima SC, Truxima, Yuflyma, Vegzelma, Herzuma, Steqeyma, and Zymfentra each surpassed KRW 100 billion in annual revenue.Traditional Pharmaceutical Companies Show Record Sales...In-House Developed Drugs Drive PerformanceMajor traditional pharmaceutical companies also posted record-breaking financial results, led by the success of their proprietary new drugs.Companies such as GC Biopharma, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, and HK inno.N saw both revenue and operating profit rise by more than 10%, driven by the strong performance of medicines developed through their accumulated R&D expertise.GC Biopharma reported an operating profit of KRW 69.1 billion last year, a 115.4% increase year-on-year, while revenue grew 18.5% to KRW 1.9913 trillion. This represents the company's largest annual revenue to date.Strong U.S. sales of the blood product Alyglo significantly bolstered performance. Alyglo's revenue in the U.S. market reached $106 million (KRW 151.1 billion) last year, a 211% increase from the previous year. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2023, Alyglo is a liquid immunoglobulin G (IVIG-SN 10%) purified from human plasma. It is indicated for the treatment of primary humoral immunodeficiency (PI), such as congenital immunodeficiency and immune thrombocytopenia. Alyglo is the first blood product developed by a South Korean company to enter the U.S. market.GC Biopharma commenced full-scale sales in July 2024, following the initial shipment of Alyglo. Alyglo's U.S. sales reached $106 million (KRW 151.1 billion) last year, growing 211% year-on-year. GC Biopharma initiated full-scale commercialization after shipping the first batch in July 2024 and surpassed $100 million in just its third year of entering the U.S. market.Daewoong Pharmaceutical's operating profit rose 33.0% to KRW 196.8 billion last year, with revenue increasing 10.4% to KRW 1.5709 trillion. This marks the fifth consecutive year since 2021 that the company has broken its own records for both revenue and operating profit.According to the pharmaceutical market research firm UBIST, prescription sales for Fexuclue reached KRW 90 billion last year, a 10.6% increase from the previous year. Fexuclue is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) indicated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It received marketing authorization in December 2021 and began full-scale sales in July 2022 following its addition to the National Health Insurance drug reimbursement list.Envlo, the 36th domestically developed new drug, saw its prescription sales rise 11.7% to KRW 11.8 billion last year. Envlo is an SGLT-2 inhibitor for diabetes, the first of its kind developed by a domestic pharmaceutical company. It received domestic approval in late 2022 and launched in May 2023.The botulinum toxin Nabota recorded KRW 228.9 billion in sales last year, up 19.0% from the prior year. Nabota's export performance grew 23% year-on-year, driven by strengthened partnerships in North America and expanded supply to emerging markets, including South America and the Middle East. Nabota received FDA approval in 2019 through a partnering company, Evolus.HK inno.N surpassed the KRW 1 trillion milestone for the first time, recording revenue of KRW 1.0631 trillion, an 18.5% increase. Operating profit rose 25.7% to KRW 110.9 billion.K-CAB, a new drug for GERD, saw its annual prescription sales reach KRW 217.9 billion, up 10.6% year-on-year. Authorized in 2018 as South Korea's 30th new drug, K-CAB is a P-CAB class treatment. After surpassing KRW 100 billion in prescriptions in 2021, just three years post-launch, it has maintained the 100-billion-won level for four consecutive years, setting a new record by exceeding KRW 200 billion last year.HK inno.N's performance was also supported by co-promotion agreements for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine and Roche's oncology drug Avastin.Profitability Gains for Hanmi, Yuhan, JW Pharm, and Boryung... SK Biopharm and SK Bioscience Benefit from New Drugs and M&AHanmi Pharmaceutical, Yuhan Corp, JW Pharmaceutical, and Boryung significantly improved profitability through their in-house new drugs.Hanmi Pharmaceutical's operating profit rose 19.3% to KRW 257.8 billion last year, while revenue increased 3.5%. Both figures represent all-time highs. Its operating profit margin stood at 16.7%, the highest among traditional pharmaceutical firms.The new combination drug Rosuzet recorded KRW 227.9 billion in outpatient prescription sales, an 8.4% increase from the previous year. Rosuzet is a combination therapy of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe. In 2024, Rosuzet became the first domestically developed drug to lead the overall market with KRW 210.3 billion in sales and has maintained the top position for two consecutive years.Last year, Hanmi Pharmaceutical's total outpatient prescription sales reached KRW 1.0151 trillion, a 2.0% increase, securing the top market position. Hanmi has held the lead in prescription performance for eight consecutive years since 2018 and is the first pharmaceutical company (domestic or foreign) to exceed KRW 1 trillion in annual prescription sales.Beijing Hanmi Pharmaceutical, the company's Chinese subsidiary, recorded revenue of KRW 402.4 billion and an operating profit of KRW 77.7 billion, surpassing the KRW 400 billion mark for the first time since its founding. This was driven by the normalization of local distribution inventory and increased sales of respiratory disease treatments. Yuhan's operating profit surged 90.2% to KRW 104.4 billion last year, while revenue rose 5.7% to KRW 2.1866 trillion. This marks the first time the company’s operating profit has exceeded KRW 100 billion, surpassing the previous high of KRW 97.8 billion set in 2016.Significant licensing income (milestone payments) contributed to this growth. Yuhan Corp recognized KRW 104.1 billion in licensing revenue last year, marking the second consecutive year of exceeding KRW 100 billion in technology-related inflows, following KRW 105.3 billion in 2024.In the fourth quarter of last year, KRW 70.3 billion in licensing revenue was generated. The milestones are from the Chinese market entry of the oncology drug Leclaza.In August last year, China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved Leclaza, in combination with Johnson & Johnson's Rybrevant, as a first-line treatment for adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR Exon 19 deletions or Exon 21 L858R substitution mutations. Yuhan Corp received a $45 million (KRW 69 billion) milestone payment from Janssen Biotech in Q4 for achieving this stage.JW Pharmaceutical's operating profit grew 13.5% to KRW 93.6 billion last year, with revenue increasing 7.7% to KRW 774.8 billion.The Livalo family, based on pitavastatin for dyslipidemia, has shown remarkable growth. Livalo (monotherapy) recorded KRW 84.8 billion, Livalozet recorded KRW 101.0 billion, and Livalo V recorded KRW 3.5 billion. Combined sales of the three Livalo products reached KRW 189.3 billion, a 16.9% increase year-on-year.Livalozet, a combination of pitavastatin and ezetimibe, has maintained a high growth trajectory since its launch in October 2021. Livalozet posted sales of KRW 64.4 billion in 2023 and KRW 76.2 billion in 2024; last year, it continued its strong performance, exceeding the KRW 100 billion mark just 4 years after launch.Hemlibra, a hemophilia treatment, saw its revenue expand 48.5% to KRW 72.6 billion last year. Hemlibra is a routine prophylactic treatment for Hemophilia A caused by Factor VIII deficiency. Sales skyrocketed after the drug was covered by health insurance for 'Hemophilia A patients aged 1 year or older without Factor VIII inhibitors' starting in May 2023.Boryung's revenue grew modestly by 1.9% to KRW 1.0360 trillion, while its operating profit jumped 21.4% to KRW 85.5 billion.Boryung improved its profitability by "maximizing self-produced product capabilities." As the proportion of in-house manufactured products—which offer better cost-of-goods margins, increased, operating profit improved. Product revenue refers to sales derived from items a company manufactures itself. Last year, Boryung's self-produced product revenue rose 11.5% to KRW 550.3 billion. In the fourth quarter, product revenue hit an all-time high of KRW 148.4 billion, up 16.8% year-on-year.Profitability was further bolstered as Boryung transitioned and began producing original drugs, such as Gemzar, Zyprexa, and Alimta, in-house. The steady growth of core businesses, including the Kanarb family and oncology treatments, drove the company's overall expansion.SK Biopharmaceuticals and SK Bioscience saw significant performance improvements driven by new drug success and M&A activity.SK Biopharmaceuticals' operating profit expanded 111.7% to KRW 203.9 billion, while revenue grew 29.1% to KRW 706.7 billion.U.S. sales of the epilepsy drug Xcopri rose 43.7% to KRW 630.3 billion. Xcopri (cenobamate) is prescribed for adults with partial-onset seizures. SK Biopharmaceuticals managed the entire process from initial development to FDA approval independently, receiving authorization in November 2019. Since May 2020, it has been sold directly through SK Life Science, the company's U.S. subsidiary. Xcopri surpassed KRW 100 billion in 2022, with sales of KRW 169.2 billion, and has continued its steep annual growth.SK Bioscience's revenue surged 143.5% to KRW 651.4 billion last year. Revenue jumped significantly as the financial results of IDT Biologika, a German CDMO acquired in 2024, began to be reflected in the consolidated statements.SK Bioscience acquired IDT Biologika in October 2024. Through a wholly owned German subsidiary, it purchased a 60% stake in IDT Biologika from the Klocke Group.Last year, IDT Biologika recorded revenue of KRW 465.7 billion, a 17% increase year-on-year. IDT Biologika accounted for more than 70% of SK Bioscience's total revenue. While sales had dropped sharply after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, the M&A strategy successfully offset the revenue gap.
- Policy
- Will the acetaminophen shortage crisis end?
- by Lee, Tak-Sun Feb 12, 2026 06:32am
- AI-generated ImageThe shortage of acetaminophen (AAP)-based fever reducers and pain relievers during COVID-19 highlighted the necessity and urgency of domestic pharmaceutical production, or pharmaceutical localization.Following this crisis, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) conducted a research project for the stable supply of essential medicines, achieving the complete domestic production of acetaminophen from active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) to finished dosage form.On the 10th, the MFDS approved Corepharm Bio’s ‘Coacet Tab 500mg’ (OTC).This product is an acetaminophen tablet and represents the first approved finished drug using a domestically developed API, which was manufactured by MFC.The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety designated acetaminophen (tablets and syrup) as a national essential drug in November 2023 and included the ingredient in its ‘National Essential Medicines Supply Stabilization Research Program’ to support the development of its manufacturing process control technologies for domestic production.The National Essential Medicines Supply Stabilization Research Program is a KRW 5 billion initiative to develop 10 domestically manufactured essential medicines.For the acetaminophen domestic production project, MFC was selected for the API manufacturing, and Corepharm Bio’s for the finished product.MFC completed development of the acetaminophen API last year and finalized its DMF (Drug Master File) registration. Corepharm Bio subsequently secured regulatory approval for the finished product using this API. Previously, APIs for acetaminophen tablets were entirely dependent on overseas sources.Analysis indicates that domestically produced acetaminophen APIs are more expensive per unit than imported alternatives, which historically made the commercialization of finished products challenging. Nevertheless, Corepharm Bio has completed receiving approval for its finished product and is in preparation for domestic market launch.Industry observers anticipate that finished products using domestic API will require sufficient drug pricing support to ensure a stable supply. Consequently, high pricing for this product is expected to be key to ensuring a stable supply.The Ministry of Health and Welfare decided last year to apply a 68% price premium to national essential medicines manufactured using domestically produced APIs. An industry official stated, “It's difficult to say that the development of domestic APIs will completely resolve supply instability. Continued pricing support and policy incentives are necessary to ensure companies can maintain stable production and supply.”
- Company
- New Nucala autoinjector indication nears reimb
- by Eo, Yun-Ho Feb 12, 2026 06:32am
- The self-injection formulation of the antibody therapy Nucala is moving closer to reimbursement listing in Korea.In January, GSK Korea reportedly accepted the condition to price the Nucala Autoinjector (mepolizumab) below the evaluation amount and successfully passed the final review by the Drug Reimbursement Evaluation Committee (DREC) of the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA).As a result, the Nucala Autoinjector now only needs to complete the drug price negotiation process with the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Because the autoinjector includes additional indications compared with the existing Nucala formulation, the reimbursement process follows procedures equivalent to a new drug, rather than a simple formulation addition.Approved domestically in March last year, the Nucala Autoinjector underwent distribution network and supply volume securing processes before launching as a non-reimbursed product in November of the same year.It remains to be seen whether Nucala, which has established its position in the eosinophilic asthma treatment space, can further expand its influence through reimbursement listing of the new formulation.The new autoinjector formulation adds indications beyond treating severe eosinophilic asthma in adults and adolescents (12 years and older), including: ▲ Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in adults ▲ Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) in adults.Nucala is a self-administered injection used to treat eosinophilic diseases. It is indicated for add-on maintenance therapy in adolescents and adults aged 12 years and older with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), as add-on maintenance therapy in adult patients with EGPA, and as add-on maintenance therapy in adult patients with HES (excluding FIP1L1-PDGFRα positive patients).The autoinjector formulation’s key feature is its convenience, which allows patients to administer the drug easily at home. This is evidenced by a self-injection success rate exceeding 96%, high patient preference, and ease of use.Meanwhile, Nucala is poised to enhance its competitiveness by securing an indication for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The drug obtained additional approval from the U.S. FDA in May as ‘add-on maintenance therapy for adult patients with COPD with an eosinophilic phenotype.’This approval was based on the results of the Phase III MATINEE and METREX studies. In these studies, among a broad spectrum of COPD patients with an eosinophilic phenotype, the Nucala treatment group showed a significantly lower annual rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations compared with placebo.
- Company
- New ADCs and immuno-oncology drugs approved for ovarian cancer
- by Son, Hyung Min Feb 12, 2026 06:31am
- The treatment landscape for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is rapidly expanding.Following the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ‘Elahere’ (mirvetuximab soravtansin), the immunotherapy ‘Keytruda’ (pembrolizumab) has gained a new indication in the US, marking its full-fledged entry into the ovarian cancer field. Eli Lilly is also focusing on developing a new ADC targeting the area.Keytruda+paclitaxel demonstrates benefit regardless of Avastin useImmuno-oncology drug KeytrudaAccording to industry sources on the 12th, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved Keytruda in combination with ‘paclitaxel ± Avastin (bevacizumab)’ for patients with PD-L1 (CPS ≥1) positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer.For epithelial ovarian cancer, which accounts for 90% of ovarian cancers, taxane-based drugs like paclitaxel and platinum-based anticancer drugs like carboplatin and cisplatin are primarily used.However, for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, which is resistant to platinum-based drugs, response rates to standard chemotherapy have generally been low, significantly limiting survival improvements.This approval is based on results from the Phase III KEYNOTE-B96 trial. In this trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to either Keytruda + paclitaxel (± Avastin) or placebo + paclitaxel (± Avastin).Analysis of 466 PD-L1-positive patients showed that the PFS in the Keytruda combination group was 8.3 months, compared to 7.2 months in the placebo combination group. Overall survival (OS) was also 18.2 months in the Keytruda combination group versus 14.0 months in the placebo combination group. This is considered the first clinical trial demonstrating a clear survival benefit for immunotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.The safety profile was consistent with known Keytruda adverse reactions, with continued emphasis on the need for monitoring immune-mediated adverse reactions.Alongside Keytruda’s indication approval, the FDA also approved PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx as a companion diagnostic, enabling patient selection.Notably, consistent benefits were confirmed regardless of whether Avastin, the existing standard therapy, was included in the combination regimen. This has led to the assessment that immunotherapy-based combination strategies are emerging as a new pillar in ovarian cancer treatment.Lilly develops next-generation FRα ADCAs the immunotherapy Keytruda received FDA approval for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, broadening treatment options in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, a new follow-up candidate has emerged in the field of FRα-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) as well.Eli Lilly’s investigational FRα ADC, sofetabart mipitecan, recently received Breakthrough Therapy designation from the FDA.The designation specifically applies to patients previously treated with Avastin and AbbVie's already commercialized FRα ADC, Elahere. While Elahere offers later line options for patients with FRα overexpression, sofetabart mipitecan demonstrated differentiated benefit by showing responses regardless of FRα expression levels.ADC anticancer drug ‘Elahere’FRα, the target of both Elahere and sofetabart mipitecan, is minimally expressed in normal tissues but highly overexpressed in ovarian cancer cells.Research indicates that approximately 35-40% of ovarian cancer patients are classified as FRα-positive, meeting Elahere’s FRα positivity criteria.The breakthrough therapy designation of sofetabart mipitecan is based on Phase I clinical trial results (NCT06400472). Data presented at major global conferences last year reported an overall response rate (ORR) of approximately 45-50% and a disease control rate (DCR) of approximately 74-78% for sofetabart mipitecan.Notably, the ORR rose to 55% in the 4mg/kg dose group, leading to its selection as the provisional recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). More significantly, ORRs of 40–54% were consistently observed across FRα expression subgroups.Regarding safety, nausea, anemia, fatigue, and vomiting were the most common adverse events. Grade 3 or higher adverse reactions included anemia (20–25%) and neutropenia (18–24%). Notably, high-grade ocular toxicity and peripheral neuropathy, which were issues in previous ADCs, were not observed. Pharmacokinetically, minimal drug accumulation was confirmed, supporting a 3-week dosing interval.The designation of this innovative therapy, which explicitly specifies the patient population, carries significant implications for future treatment sequencing. The fact that it demonstrated meaningful response even in patients who had already undergone Avastin and Elahere therapy suggests this ADC has the potential to emerge as a new standard option in later-line therapy. Lilly is currently conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial for sofetabart mipitecan.
- Company
- "Request to postpone drug price reform"…KPBMA issues resolution
- by Chon, Seung-Hyun Feb 11, 2026 08:09am
- During the board meeting held on February 10, the Korea Pharmaceutical and Bio-Pharma Manufacturers Association (KPBMA ) announced a resolution urging the government to suspend and delay the implementation of its proposed drug pricing reform.The Korea Pharmaceutical and Bio-Pharma Manufacturers Association (KPBMA ) held the first board meeting of the year on February 10, and unanimously adopted a resolution urging the government to suspend and delay the implementation of its proposed drug pricing reform.Through its resolution, the KPBMA Board of Directors urged the government to ▲ delay the vote and implementation of the large-scale drug price reduction plan by the Health Insurance Policy Deliberation Committee ▲an impact assessment on how these cuts would affect public health and employment ▲the abolition of the market-linked actual transaction price implementation plan ▲ support measures to help small and medium-sized pharmaceutical companies upgrade their business structures ▲a formal governance structure between the government and industry to regularly discuss drug pricing policies and industrial growth.Previously, in November of last year, the Ministry of Health and Welfare reported to the Health Insurance Policy Deliberation Committee a reform plan to drop the price calculation rate for generics and patent-expired drugs from 53.55% to the 40% range. This restructured pricing system is slated for a final vote in February, with implementation following in July.The board stated, "The industry, which should be fueled with the heat of innovation and challenge, has been thrown into shock by the government's unilateral and rapid push for price cuts centered on domestic prescription drugs," and added, "If the government continues to treat domestic pharmaceuticals merely as tools for cutting the health insurance budget, the industry will face a collapse of its overall foundation, characterized by shrinking R&D investment, reduced facility spending, workforce downsizing, and a weakened supply chain."Korean pharmaceutical companies are concerned that, if the government's large-scale drug price reductions are enforced, they will be forced to abandon essential long-term research and development (R&D) in favor of short-term survival strategies. This would result in destroying sustainable industry structure and deteriorate industry competitiveness.The Board of Directors emphasized, "Large-scale drug price reductions would worsen pharmaceutical companies' profitability to an unsustainable level. This would force companies to abandon the production of exit-prevention medicines and low-priced essential drugs, which are indispensable to the public, thereby leading to the loss of the nation's health security foundation."The board stated, "If our demands are ignored, we will pursue all possible measures to defend health security and national competitiveness, including adopting a petition to the President, making a public appeal to the citizens, and filing legislative petitions."During the meeting, the board officially appointed the vice-chairman candidates recommended by incoming Chairman Kwon Kibum, who is set to begin his two-year term this March, as originally proposed.The 15 vice-chairmen who will form the leadership team alongside Chairman Kwon include, ▲Kim Woo Tae, Chairman of Guju Pharm ▲Yoon Jae-Chu, Vice Chairman of Daewoong ▲Baek In-hwan, President of Daewon Pharmaceutical ▲Jae-hun Jung, CEO of Dong-A ST ▲Kim Jung-gyun, CEO of Boryung ▲Jaeyong Ahn, President of SK Bioscience ▲Son Jee-woong, President of LG Chem Life Sciences ▲Cho Wook-je, President of Yuhan Corporation ▲Yoon Woong-sup, Chairman of Il-dong Pharmaceutical ▲Shin Young-seop, President of JW Pharmaceutical ▲Han Sang-cheol, President of Jeil Pharmaceutical ▲Young-Joo Kim, President of Chong Kun Dang ▲Eun-chul Huh, President of GC Biopharma ▲Park Jae-hyun, President of Hanmi Pharmaceutical ▲Yoon Sung-tae, Chairman of Huons Group.The board also reappointed three full-time executives whose terms expire at the end of February—Vice Chairman Lee Jae-gook, Senior Managing Director Eum Seung-in, and Managing Director Hong Jung-ki—and appointed Park Ji-man, head of the Public Relations Division, as a new full-time executive (Managing Director).Additionally, the board approved the recommendations for 48 directors (including the current leadership) and two auditors, which will be submitted as agenda items for the 81st Regular General Assembly on February 24. The general assembly will also address the revised articles of incorporation, the 2025 financial settlement, and the 2026 business plan and budget, all of which were passed during this board meeting.Chairman Yoon Woong-sup stated "The drug pricing reform currently under discussion is a policy that weakens the R&D investment base and the industry's future competitiveness, and added, "We will focus on creating a policy environment where industrial sustainability and public health improvement can harmonize through a strategic response led by the emergency committee."KPBMA President Yunhong Noh stated, "KPBMA intends to mobilize all means to achieve the goals of leaping forward as a global powerhouse in new drug development and establishing a national health safety net," and concluded, "We ask member companies to continue to support to ensure that all countermeasures are pursued to overcome the current difficulties."
